The organization in
charge of introducing new internet addresses to rival ".com" briefly
suspended access to some of the documents on its website after a privacy gaffe.
The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers said it had mistakenly
published the postal addresses of some individuals, information that was meant
to be private. The disclosure was limited to cities and countries in some
cases, while full street addresses appeared in others. The discovery came late
Thursday, a day after Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers revealed
nearly 2000 proposals for new Internet suffixes, including ".joy,"
".barefoot" and ".google." It will be the largest expansion
of the Internet address system since its creation in the year 1980s. Internet Corporation
for Assigned Names and Numbers posted documents with the proposals to allow the
public to comment and raise objections. The documents include bidders' plans
for the new names and full contact information for the businesses involved, but
they were supposed to list only phone and email information belonging to
individuals. Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers restored those
documents after removing the postal addresses on individuals. It was not
immediately clear how long that took; the documents appeared to be inaccessible
for no more than a few hours. Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and
Numbers did not immediately respond to requests for more information Friday.
This spring, Internet
Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers had to suspend access to its system
for letting bidders submit proposals after it discovered technical glitches
that exposed some private data. That took more than a month to fix and restore.
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers also goofed during
Wednesday's announcement. It displayed Arabic names left to right rather than
right to left, as the language is written. The latest gaffe provided more
fodder for critics of Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers and
the name expansion. Skeptics have questioned Internet Corporation for Assigned
Names and Numbers ability to run the program smoothly in the long run, given
that technical problems have cropped up early on. "If this weren't all so
incredibly serious, one could get quite a laugh over the concept of The Gang
That Couldn't Shoot Straight being in charge of this process," Lauren
Weinstein, co-founder of People For Internet Responsibility, said on his
Privacy Forum mailing list. Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
officials say the names expansion will permit innovation and increase choice. A
new suffix could, for instance, be used to identify sites that have a certain
level of security protection. It could be used to create online neighbor hoods
of businesses affiliated with a geographic area or an industry. Critics say the
names will create confusion among internet users, while providing little
benefit in an era where people often find websites by using a search engine
rather than typing in the address.
Source: The Times of India
No comments:
Post a Comment